Document EDCSSJeffHoehl
Last modified by Hal Eden on 2010/08/20 11:06
Document EDCSSJeffHoehl
- Name
- Jeff Hoehl
- Age
- 27
- SelectedRole
- Campus Faculty/Staff
- DescribeOther
- Group
- A
- What affordances of the paper exercises did you prefer?
- Very easy to add/remove height easy to move "buildings" around easy to visualize relative height
- What affordances of the EDC exercises did you prefer?
- 3D view was nice (but slow) Calculations were automatic to track progress Everyone was more involved
- What limitations did you find in the paper exercise?
- Math was slow and inaccurate No ground-level view
- What limitations did you find in the EDC exercise?
- zooming and changing perspectives was slow and halted updates changing number of floors was difficult minor bugs in math, had to force updates
- In what ways did you find the paper exercise supported you in your task?
- very fast and easy to move things around and play with different ideas
- In what ways did you find the EDC exercise supported you in your task?
- it was easier to see the impact of building heights on views the automatic calculations helped everyone focus on the square footage
- Comments
- an upgrade of the EDC hardware for speed would help a lot